the real cost of funding and cashing out by bank transfer at GB bookmakers

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Updated as of 30 October 2026 against the Gambling Commission’s public register and operator-published payment terms. A bank transfer at a British bookmaker is the everyday thing — debit card and Faster Payments settle inside seconds, bank-account withdrawals leave the operator within hours. Below is what those minutes and hours cost, which GB-licensed brands handle them best, and the statutory backdrop that determines which side of the bet is paying.

The cashless pound: what bank transfer means on a British betting site

Bank transfer, in the British market, almost always means one of three things, and the difference between them is the difference between funding a bet inside two minutes and waiting two days. The first is Faster Payments, the real-time scheme operated by Pay.UK since 2008 and now embedded across every high-street bank and most challenger banks in the country. The second is BACS, the older batched scheme that takes three working days between accounts and is mostly a backstop for corporate and large transfers. The third is CHAPS, same-day and irrevocable, used for £250,000-and-up transactions that a betting customer is unlikely to place.

For a punter, Faster Payments is the thing. It runs 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Most transfers arrive in seconds; a small share can take up to two hours at the receiving end if a bank queues the payment for an internal check. The Faster Payments scheme sets a £1,000,000 per-transaction ceiling, which is a ceiling no British bookmaker imposes on a single deposit — but individual banks can, and routinely do, set their own daily Faster Payments caps well below that ceiling for retail customers.

That last clause is the one that catches people out. A bookmaker accepts £20,000 by Faster Payments; the customer’s bank limits Faster Payments to £5,000 a day. The transfer refuses. The customer assumes the betting site is the problem. It is not — it is the issuing bank.

Bank transfer is not the same as a debit card transaction. The card rails still run through Faster Payments underneath, but the debit card network applies its own authorisation check (3-D Secure, the cardholder’s bank) before the transfer is initiated, which is why a card deposit can be declined even when the bookmaker and Faster Payments are both open for business. Going direct by Faster Payments skips the card network entirely: the customer authorises the transfer inside their banking app to the operator’s published sort code and account number, and the money lands.

The cost angle is what makes Faster Payments worth understanding. There is no interchange fee on a Faster Payments transfer — no charge to the sender, no fee deducted by the receiving bookmaker. Compare that with a credit card deposit, which has been banned for British gambling since 14 April 2020, or with a debit card transaction that takes a small merchant fee out of the bookmaker’s take. Direct Faster Payments is, for most British bettors, the cheapest way to move money into a betting account, and the only one that costs the punter nothing on either end.

The statute behind the transfer

Three pieces of framework decide what a bank transfer at a GB bookmaker looks like, and they were not written with betting in mind.

The Gambling Act 2005 covers Great Britain — not Northern Ireland, which has its own older law. Under sections 33 and 36 of that Act, as amended by the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014, an operator whose remote facilities are used by customers in Great Britain needs a Gambling Commission licence wherever the operator is based. A Curaçao, Maltese or Gibraltar incorporation is not a substitute. That is why the Commission’s public register is the whole test of who holds a GB licence: a brand can run its own operations in Gibraltar and still take British customers, provided it is on the register under a Commission account number.

Identity is verified before the first deposit. Name, address and date of birth are checked against public records and, where needed, against documents supplied by the customer — a rule in force since 7 May 2019. There is no anonymous play at a licensed GB site. No, an “anonymous bank transfer” exists at the licensed tier. A bank account in someone else’s name used to fund a betting account, a transfer routed through a third party, or a deposit from a corporate account opened in a name other than the registered customer’s, will fail source-of-funds checks at some point on the way.

Credit cards are banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020. The Commission estimated that around 800,000 consumers used credit cards to gamble in 2018, and found that 22% of online gamblers who did so were classed as problem gamblers. The ban covers credit-card-funded payments through e-wallets, but not debit cards, not bank transfers, and not the kind of prepaid card that runs off a current account. A Visa Debit card is fine; a Visa Credit card is not. Bank transfer deposits are unaffected.

Beyond the credit-card rule and the identity check, no British statute prescribes which payment methods a bookmaker must accept, sets a default deposit ceiling, requires a bank-account-in-the-bettor’s-name rule, or addresses cryptocurrency deposits at licensed operators. A bookmaker is free to accept Faster Payments or refuse it, free to set a £5 floor and free to set a £100,000 ceiling. The payment policy on the operator’s terms page is the rule.

The safer-gambling layer bank transfer runs through

Bank transfer deposits flow through one of the strongest safer-gambling filters the British market has built. Several banks — Monzo from April 2018, Barclays from the end of that year, Starling and others since — offer a gambling transaction block on current accounts. Monzo’s block takes effect immediately when switched on, with a 48-hour cooling-off period before it can be turned off. Starling Bank runs the same cooling-off pattern. NatWest offers the block on its credit cards but not on its debit cards, which is the limit of what a bank’s own switch can do for a bettor who funds from a NatWest debit.

Research from Bristol University suggests that around half of bank customers who opt into a gambling transaction block end up spending less or no money on gambling afterwards. That is a more direct intervention than anything the bookmaker can apply on its own deposit screen.

The Commission layer sits on top. GAMSTOP, the multi-operator self-exclusion scheme, has been a mandatory licence condition for online operators since 31 March 2020. Customers can exclude for six months, one year, five years or five years with auto-renewal, and after the minimum period the exclusion stays in place for a further seven years unless the customer asks GAMSTOP to lift it. A gambling block at the bank does the same job at a different choke point: neither the bookmaker nor the bank sees the deposit if the block is in place. A deposit limit set inside the betting account is a third filter, applied by the customer themselves, and one of the cheaper habits a regular bettor can adopt.

When a customer’s deposits minus withdrawals cross £150 in a rolling 30 days, a financial vulnerability check fires — a public-record scan for county court judgments and bankruptcy orders, not an income check and not a credit reference check. A more substantial financial risk assessment, of the kind the press calls an affordability check, has been announced in a staged plan with no start date. A bettor whose stake size outruns what their bank statements comfortably show should expect a request for evidence of funds at some point on the way through.

Crypto, anonymity and the bank-transfer shortlist

Crypto at a GB-licensed bookmaker is a near-empty shelf. The Commission’s published framework does not list crypto as a permitted payment rail — that is a quiet decision rather than a stated ban — and the practical effect is that no mainstream GB bookmaker accepts Bitcoin, Ether or stablecoins at the cashier. Several offshore brands run a crypto desk, but offshore brands are outside the British licence frame. A customer betting at an offshore brand with crypto gets pseudonymous funding and loses the British protection layer in the same trade: no GAMSTOP coverage, no Commission complaints route, no approved dispute-resolution body, no British consumer redress if funds are withheld, and no obligation on the operator to honour the 10x bonus cap or the £150 vulnerability check.

Anonymous bank transfer betting, as a search term, mostly points at the offshore shelf. At a GB-licensed operator, an anonymous transfer is not a thing: the deposit hits a named bank account that the operator verifies against the registered customer, and the customer has been verified before the first deposit anyway. A transfer can be hard to trace in transit — that is a property of Faster Payments — but on arrival at the bookmaker it lands in a named account against a verified identity. The combination is what kills the “anonymous” claim. It is the bank transfer that is fast, not the customer behind it.

The honest picture: Faster Payments is the cheapest, the cleanest and the most British payment rail on a GB-licensed site, and there is no anonymity gain from using it over any other method. Crypto funding means leaving the British frame, and the cost of leaving it is the protection layer going with you.

Bonuses, free bets and what bank-transfer deposits actually unlock

A bank transfer deposit is, by the standards of most GB-licensed operators’ promotional terms, a qualifying deposit. The days when bookmakers excluded bank transfer from their welcome bonus have largely passed — Faster Payments is now treated as a standard funding method. The promotional frame that decides whether the bonus lands is the wagering requirement and the qualifying bet rules, not the funding method.

A wagering requirement is the multiple of the bonus that has to be turned over in qualifying bets before the bonus balance becomes withdrawable cash. The Commission’s promotional rule, in force since 19 January 2026, caps wagering requirements at 10x. A £10 bonus with a 50x requirement is now non-compliant; under the cap, no more than £100 of turnover can be required for a £10 bonus. The cap applies to bonus offers. Whether it applies to free bets with no wagering condition is not settled in the public rules, and bookmakers continue to publish terms that vary by brand.

A free bet, on a GB bookmaker’s page, is one of two things. The first is a bet token whose stake is not returned with a winning bet: a £10 free bet at odds of 3/1 returns £40 profit, not £50. The second is a bet credit that is returned with the stake in some cases. Each operator’s terms say which. Most GB free-bet offers pay out profit only. The promotional rule caps the wagering requirement, not the conditions on the free bet itself.

Mixed-product promotions — an offer that requires gambling on two or more product types, for instance “bet on football to get free spins” — are banned under the same 19 January 2026 rule. A sports welcome from a sports-only bookmaker is fine; a sportsbook that sells the customer casino spins on top is not, unless the offer is structured so the customer can take one without the other.

The cheapest offers at the GB tier tend to be the ones with the least condition. A £30 free bet bundle at 1/1 minimum odds, no wagering on the bonus, no cap on winnings from the free bet, is a better offer than a £100 matched bonus with a 10x turnover on bonus plus deposit. The number on the front of the offer is the headline. The number behind it — turnover, minimum odds, qualifying deposit, deadline — is the cost.

A bank-transfer deposit at most GB bookmakers qualifies for the headline. Underneath the headline, read the small print for the qualifying bet, the expiry of the free bet, and the cap on winnings. Those three clauses are where the offer’s real price lives.

Payments and payout speed at the cashier

The cash-out rail is where Faster Payments’ speed matters most. A withdrawal from a GB-licensed bookmaker, once approved internally, runs through the same Faster Payments scheme as the deposit and reaches the customer’s bank account in seconds, occasionally up to two hours. The bottleneck is the bookmaker’s own internal processing: how long the operator takes between the withdrawal request and the Faster Payments instruction.

Smarkets’ published terms put withdrawals through Faster Payments within six hours from £10 up to £100,000. Most of the other brands in this comparison sit somewhere in that band. A small number publish same-day processing; a small number take longer. The interesting figure is the floor — how little can be withdrawn — because a bookmaker that pays out £1.50 in winnings is more useful to a casual punter than one that insists on a £10 minimum.

Deposit rails vary more than withdrawal rails. Most GB bookmakers accept debit cards (Visa Debit and Mastercard Debit), Apple Pay and PayPal. Some accept Pay by Bank (Open Banking, a direct bank-authorisation transfer that bypasses the card network), Revolut Pay, Trustly, Paysafecard or Skrill. DAZN Bet’s published floor is £5 by debit card, Apple Pay, Paysafecard, Trustly or Skrill, and £20 by PayPal. LiveScore Bet’s payment methods page lists debit cards, Apple Pay, PayPal, Pay by Bank and Revolut Pay. The Faster Payments direct-transfer option, where the customer sends a deposit from their banking app to the bookmaker’s sort code and account number, is published by Smarkets as “open bank transfer”, instant from £10 to £10,000.

Fees on deposits are rare at the GB tier — DAZN Bet publishes no processing fees on its payment methods page. Fees on withdrawals are rarer. The transaction cost is the interchange fee the bookmaker pays on a card deposit, which is a merchant-side cost the operator absorbs in its margin. For a direct Faster Payments transfer, there is no interchange fee at all.

The customer’s bank may cap on the gap between what the bookmaker accepts and what the bank allows. That gap is the practical ceiling on a Faster Payments deposit, and it sits inside the customer’s own banking app.

What this ranking is based on

This is a ten-brand comparison of GB-licensed bookmakers, ordered by how cheaply, quickly and reliably they handle bank transfer and Faster Payments at the cashier and in the payout queue. The four measures, in this order, are:

1. Whether the operator accepts Faster Payments or open-banking transfer directly, and from what minimum deposit.
2. The published withdrawal-processing window.
3. The strength of the qualifying-deposit rules for the welcome offer (a free bet on a £5 qualifying deposit is friendlier than a free bet on a £10 deposit at 1/2 odds).
4. The reputational record: how long the brand has held a GB licence, who runs the licence, and what safer-gambling tools sit on the customer account.

The Faster Payments frame is the spine of the comparison: every GB bookmaker settles deposits and withdrawals through it, and the difference between the best and the worst on this list is the difference between processing the transfer in minutes and processing it in hours.

The comparison at a glance

The ten bookmakers, in order

LiveScore Bet — the open-banking-native cashier

LiveScore Bet, run by LiveScore Betting and Gaming (Gibraltar) Limited under Commission account 56859, is one of the few GB-licensed bookmakers to publish Pay by Bank (Open Banking) as a first-class deposit method alongside Apple Pay, PayPal and the debit cards. Open Banking means the customer authorises a Faster Payments transfer from their banking app directly to the operator, with no card network in between and no interchange fee on either side. The deposit is instant; the transaction is traceable to the named account the bank verified when it issued the Faster Payments instruction.

For a punter who wants the cheapest rail in the market, an open-banking-first cashier is the right match. The cost is the absence of the card-network chargeback route — a Faster Payments transfer is authorised by the customer, not disputed by their bank afterwards. That is not a problem at a regulated GB bookmaker with a Commission complaints process, but it is the one feature of the debit card rail that disappears when a punter switches to open banking.

LiveScore Bet is the pick for a punter who prioritises the speed of a direct banking-app authorisation over the chargeback safety of a card payment.

Star Sports — the safer-gambling-first small operator

Star Racing Limited runs Star Sports under Commission account 9177, with the app published for the UK and Ireland. The My Account area is where this brand earns its keep: deposit limits, a Play Break facility and self-exclusion are wired in, and the published messaging around them is plainer than most. The payment rails are the standard GB set — debit card, bank transfer and the usual e-wallets.

For a punter whose safer-gambling tools are the deciding factor, Star Sports sits at the front of the queue. For a punter shopping on welcome-bonus size, Star Sports is a quieter name on the high street and the promotional offer is not the loudest in the market.

For the customer who prioritises safer-gambling tools over welcome bonuses, Star Sports is the clear choice.

Sky Bet — the £5 qualifying-deposit welcome

Sky Bet, run by SBG Sports Limited under Commission account 67370, runs the friendliest welcome offer on this list for a casual bankroller. The published terms credit £30 in free bets as three £10 free-bet tokens after a deposit of at least £5 and a first single or each-way bet of at least £0.05 at odds of 1/1 or greater. A £5 deposit and a 5p qualifying bet clears the offer; the rest of the £30 lands as free bet credit.

The small qualifying bet is the stand-out detail. Most welcome offers demand a £10 deposit and a £10 qualifying bet at minimum odds of 1/2 — a £5 qualifying bet of which only 5p has to land. The free bet credit is the standard kind: stake not returned. The wagering requirement, under the Commission’s 19 January 2026 rule, is capped at 10x; Sky Bet’s free-bet tokens have no wagering requirement of their own.

Sky Bet offers the most accessible welcome package for a casual bettor, with a low-stakes qualifying threshold.

Midnite — the rapid-payout rewards club

Midnite Limited runs Midnite under Commission account 101839, with the app published by Dribble Media Limited. The published product line is in-play, an acca builder, popular accas and price boosts with maximum-stake limits; the rewards side is a weekly rewards club and rapid payouts. The “rapid payouts” line is what makes this brand interesting for a Faster Payments customer, though the operator has not published a specific processing window in the materials available.

For a punter who values the acca-builder feature and likes a weekly rewards cycle, Midnite is a credible pick. The in-play product is a real area for the brand; the price-boost feature is the kind of promotion that does well at the casual end of the market. The maximum-stake limits on price boosts are the guardrail on the offer.

Midnite suits the acca specialist who values price boosts and weekly rewards as part of their regular routine.

DAZN Bet — the lowest deposit floor

DZBT Limited runs DAZN Bet under Commission account 48756. The payment page is the stand-out detail: deposits from £5 by debit card, Apple Pay, Paysafecard, Trustly or Skrill, and from £20 by PayPal. There are no processing fees. The £5 deposit floor is the lowest in this comparison and is the right rail for a customer whose bankroll is small and who does not want to top up a betting account beyond what they plan to stake in a week.

The £20 PayPal floor is the friction. A casual customer who keeps their betting money in PayPal rather than in a bank account will pay the extra £15 to fund a deposit. A customer whose main rail is a debit card or Apple Pay will not.

DAZN Bet is designed for the low-stakes bettor who relies on debit cards or Apple Pay for their deposits.

Smarkets — the open-bank-transfer exchange

Smarkets (Malta) Limited runs Smarkets under Commission account 39173 as a betting intermediary — the licence for a betting exchange. The published payment terms are the clearest in this comparison. Open bank transfer deposits are instant from £10 to £10,000; withdrawals are processed within six hours from £10 to £100,000; UK debit card deposits are instant from £10 to £15,000. No processing fee on either side. The window between withdrawal request and funds in the bank account is the line that matters for a punter, and six hours is at the fast end of the GB exchange tier.

The product is an exchange, not a sportsbook. Back and lay pricing; SP at the start of a horse race; commission on net winnings. A punter who wants to lay bets and trade positions will value Smarkets’ cashier. A punter who wants price boosts and acca insurance will not.

Smarkets is the choice for a bettor seeking exchange-style pricing combined with a high-speed payout window.

Kalooki Sportsbook — the in-minutes withdrawal promise

Kalooki Sportsbook Limited (company number 12938274) runs the brand under Commission account 57730 and is a GAMSTOP member. The published withdrawal promise is instant by bank transfer, processed within minutes. The product side is Best Odds Guaranteed on UK and Irish horse racing, in-play betting, daily boosts and extra place races. The promotional line is racing-led.

A punter whose betting is on UK and Irish racing will see most of what they want on this brand. A punter whose betting is on football, tennis or American sports will see a thinner product than on Sky Bet or Midnite. The withdrawal promise is the differentiator at the cashier.

Kalooki Sportsbook caters to the racing enthusiast who prioritises ultra-fast withdrawals.

Kwiff — the Trustly cashier and the 3,500-game casino

Eaton Gate Gaming Limited runs Kwiff under Commission account 44448. The cashier is the published differentiator: Trustly payments for deposits and withdrawals, with quick processing on both. The product side is a sportsbook bolted to a casino with more than 3,500 games. The “supercharged” odds feature, where a price can be boosted randomly on a market, is the brand’s published hook.

For a punter who wants a single login for sports and casino, Kwiff is a credible option. For a punter who keeps their sports betting and their casino play on separate accounts, the casino side is bloat.

Kwiff is the platform for the bettor who combines sports and casino play within a single, Trustly-powered account.

Bet Ahoy — the racing promotions stack

Bet Ahoy Ltd runs the brand under Commission account 100094. The promotional stack is the standout: a 10% Acca Bonus up to £1,000, Sub-Cover for player substitutions on football, Best Odds Guaranteed on UK and Irish horse and greyhound racing up to £100, and Double Result payout on UK and Irish racing. Each of those terms is a different way to give the punter a little back, and the four together are a more generous racing package than most of the brands in this comparison.

A punter whose betting is racing-led and who likes acca insurance on the side will appreciate the stack. A punter whose betting is on football outright markets will see less of the offer.

Verdict: the right home for a racing-and-acca punter who wants the most generous published promotional stack in this comparison.

Betboro — the £25 matched free bet on a small first wager

Webmedia Development N.V. runs Betboro under Commission account 44181. The sports welcome offer is a 100% matched free bet of up to £25 on the first qualifying wager. The qualifying conditions are a debit card deposit of at least £10 and a first bet of £5 to £25 with at least three selections each at 3/5 (1.60) or higher.

The qualifier is tighter than Sky Bet’s £5 deposit and 5p first bet. A punter who wants the matched free bet has to stake £5 to £25 of their own money on a treble or longer at minimum odds of 3/5 on every leg. The matched free bet is paid in free bet credit, not cash, and the stake is not returned with a winning free bet — the standard GB free-bet term. Under the 19 January 2026 promotional rule, wagering requirements on bonuses are capped at 10x; the matched free bet carries no wagering requirement of its own.

Verdict: the right home for a treble punter who wants a £25 ceiling on the matched free bet and is happy with the 3/5-each-leg qualifier.

What bank transfer costs the British bettor in real numbers

Three numbers decide what bank transfer costs a British bettor, and each one is small in isolation but compounds over a year.

The first is the cost of the transfer itself. Direct Faster Payments is free to send and free to receive. A debit card deposit carries an interchange fee paid by the bookmaker, not the customer; the customer never sees it. An e-wallet like PayPal or Skrill takes a small fee out of the deposit. Across a year of weekly £20 deposits, a punter who switches from PayPal to direct Faster Payments saves the e-wallet fee on each deposit. That saving is small per deposit and noticeable over fifty-two weeks.

The second is the time cost of a withdrawal. A withdrawal from a GB-licensed bookmaker, once approved, runs through Faster Payments and reaches the bank account in seconds to two hours. The bottleneck is the bookmaker’s internal processing. A brand that processes in six hours (Smarkets’ published window) is faster than a brand that processes overnight; a brand that processes instantly (Kalooki’s published promise) is faster still. Across a year of monthly withdrawals, a punter who values the time cost of a withdrawal ranks brands by their published processing window, not by their bonus.

The third is the safer-gambling cost of the deposit itself. A gambling transaction block at the bank is free, takes effect immediately and lasts until switched off. A deposit limit set inside the betting account is free and adjustable. GAMSTOP is free. The cheaper habit is to set the limit and leave it alone.

For a low-stakes punter, direct Faster Payments is the cheapest rail. For a high-stakes punter, the same is true, with the addition of a published processing window they can plan around. For a punter whose bank imposes a daily Faster Payments cap below what the bookmaker accepts, the practical ceiling is the bank’s, and the workaround is a debit card deposit or a daily top-up over several days.

What to check before the first transfer

Three checks decide whether a bookmaker is the right one to send a Faster Payments transfer to.

The first is the Gambling Commission’s public register. The Commission’s business-name and domain search confirms the brand holds a GB licence, the licence number, the licence holder, and the licence category. A brand that cannot be found on the register is not licensed, and a licensed brand is the only kind a British bettor should send money to. No single brand is “the only” licensed one — the register lists far more brands than this article features.

The second is the operator’s own payment methods page. The minimum deposit, the maximum withdrawal, the processing window, the fee policy and the qualifying-deposit terms for any welcome offer are stated on that page. The terms govern; the welcome banner does not.

The third is the customer’s own bank. The Faster Payments ceiling, the daily debit card limit, the gambling transaction block switch in the banking app, and the bank’s own view of gambling transactions are all set inside the customer’s account. A bank that has blocked gambling transactions is the cheapest filter the customer has.

A bank transfer is not the cheapest rail in isolation — it is the cheapest rail in combination with a licensed operator and a sensible safer-gambling layer. The combination is what the page is about.

Frequently asked questions

Can you bet against bank transfer in Great Britain?

Yes, against — in the sense of placing bets at bookmakers that accept bank transfer. Every GB-licensed bookmaker accepts debit cards and most accept Faster Payments directly. A bettor can fund an account from a bank account, place bets, and withdraw winnings back to the same account, subject to the bookmaker’s published payment terms. The credit-card ban of 14 April 2020 does not affect bank transfer.

Can you lose on bank transfer betting?

Yes — a betting account is not a savings account. A bank transfer moves money into and out of a betting account, but the money inside the account can be lost on unsuccessful bets. The Gambling Commission’s safer-gambling tools — GAMSTOP, deposit limits set by the customer, gambling transaction blocks at the bank — exist to limit the size of that loss. Spread betting, where losses can exceed the stake, is regulated separately by the FCA, not the Commission.

Can you use bank transfer in betting shops?

Yes, betting shops accept cash and debit cards over the counter, and most high-street bookmakers can take a bank transfer or card payment on the betting shop’s betting terminal. A bettor who funds an online account by Faster Payments from a banking app is using a different rail than the in-shop card terminal, but both end up at the same betting account.

Which payment methods do GB-licensed bookmakers accept, and are credit cards allowed?

GB-licensed bookmakers accept debit cards (Visa Debit and Mastercard Debit), most accept Apple Pay and PayPal, and many accept open-banking transfer, Trustly, Revolut Pay or Skrill. Credit cards are banned for gambling in Great Britain since 14 April 2020, including credit-card-funded payments through e-wallets. Bank transfer and debit card deposits are unaffected. No British rule prescribes which other methods a bookmaker must accept, and the operator’s own payment methods page is the rule.

From what age can bets be placed in Great Britain, and when is identity verified?

Bets can be placed from age 18. Identity — name, address and date of birth — is verified before the first deposit, a rule in force since 7 May 2019, including when a customer is claiming a free bet or bonus. A financial vulnerability check fires when deposits minus withdrawals exceed £150 in a rolling 30-day window. There is no anonymous play at a licensed GB site.

How can it be checked that a bookmaker holds a Gambling Commission licence?

The Gambling Commission’s public register, on the Commission’s website, is searchable by business name, trading name, domain or account number. A search returns the licence number, the licence holder, the licence category, and the address. A brand that does not appear on the register is not licensed, and an unlicensed brand is outside the British protection layer.

Content created by the «tenniscourttips.com» team